Chemistry Attitude and Experience Questionnaire (CAEQ)
Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ) measures first-year university chemistry students' attitude toward chemistry, chemistry self-efficacy, and learning experiences. The instrument was developed as part of a larger study and sought to fulfill a need for an instrument to investigate factors that influence student enrollment choice. We set out to design the instrument in a manner that would maximize construct validity. The CAEQ was piloted with a cohort of science and technology students at the end of their first year.
Average Review: (4.0)
Supplemental Information:
- Survey.pdf (317 KB) Download
Assessment Type:
Likert scaleScale:
5-point Likert scalePublication Date:
Aug 04, 2003Respondent:
First-year undergraduate students in science and technology departmentsDomain(s) Evaluated:
Attitude / BehaviorSample items:
Please indicate what you think about the following.Chemists
1. unfit _ _ _ _ _ athletic
2. socially unaware _ _ _ _ _ socially aware
Please indicate how confident you feel about:
1. Applying a set of chemistry rules to different elements of the Periodic Table.
a. not confident _ _ _ _ _ confident
2. Achieving a passing grade in a chemical hazards course.
a. not confident _ _ _ _ _ confident
Reliability:
Reliability of SHORT version CA= 0.8625Validity:
0.80Frequency:
SometimesAdministration time:
15 minutesRequires a Computer:
NoRequires Internet Access:
NoPrimary reference:
Dalgety, J., Coll, R. K., Hones, J. (2003). Development of Chemistry Attitudes and Experiences Questionnaire (CAEQ). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), pp. 649-668.Comments:
Other Reference:Bramaje, G., P. & Espinosa, A., A. (2013). Peer-Led team learning approach: Effects on students' conceptual understanding and attitude towards chemistry. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. 5(2), 55-77.
The study found the original CAEQ (full length version) had a Cronbach alpha of 0.8577, the shortened version was pilot tested using 87 third year high school students, the reliability of this version was 0.8625 using Cronbach alpha. Due to this analysis the study subsequently used the shortened version of the survey to assess Peer-Led team learning. This suggests the continued validity and reliability of the original survey and possible inclusion/update of the shorter version which had higher internal consistency.
STEM Criteria
Science
YesTechnology
NoEngineering
NoMath
No
Contact
Dr. Richard Coll
Deputy Vice-Chancellor
The University of the South Pacific
richard.coll(at)usp.ac.fj
Dr. Richard Coll
Deputy Vice-Chancellor
The University of the South Pacific
richard.coll(at)usp.ac.fj