Supplemental Information:

n/a

Assessment Type:

Inventory/Questionnaire

Scale:

5-point scale

Publication Date:

Jul 14, 2025

Respondent:

student

Domain(s) Evaluated:

Attitude / Behavior

Sample items:

This team member was actively involved in: monitoring progress toward due dates; challenging

Reliability:

internal consistency: Based on the exploratory factor analysis results, Cronbach's alphas ranged from .86 to .90.

Validity:

Content validity: The initial content adequacy processes provided a good indication of the content domain of the dimensions.

Frequency:

Rarely

Administration time:

0 minutes

Requires a Computer:

Yes

Requires Internet Access:

No

Primary reference:

Michel, J. W., & Luvison, D. (2024). Development and validation of the individual teamwork behaviors questionnaire. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 28(2), 443-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241267986 (Original work published 2025)

Comments:

Content Validity: The initial content adequacy processes provided a good indication of the content domain of the dimensions. Convergent and Discriminant Construct Validity: The average variance extracted (AVE) values ranged from .60 to .66, indicating good evidence for the convergent validity of the factors. A combined CFA with the Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME; Loughry et al., 2007) supported the measure's discriminant validity. Incremental and Predictive Validity: Both sets of regressions showed that the ITBQ accounted for incremental variance beyond the CATME in predicting perceptions of commitment to and satisfaction with the team. Criterion and Nomological Validity: Validity was also supported through the measure's fit within the nomological network of established teamwork measures.

STEM Criteria

Science

Yes

Technology

Yes

Engineering

Yes

Math

Yes